… and guess what? Imho, I’m not the one acting childish. :D
Anyway, here we go again. Did you ask her for her consent before copy pasting the chat logs on your blog, DesertWolf? ;) Honey told me before that I should not participate in this highly intellectual discussion - I think that was her way to tell me I’m stupid - but by now I’m starting to think she’s the one that could benefit from a brain cells donation, not me. :D
The italic part paragraphs are quotes from what Honey Wendt said to DesertWolf.
… to tell you that the conversation between me and her was totally different from what she posted, since she wanted this type of attention, I just muted her and never responded back to her.
Yeah right! I can shortly summerize the whole conversation: Honey Wendt telling me about the TOS, me saying I couldn’t care less about the TOS as it where (and are) her RL blog ethics I did (and do) not agree upon. And then Honey saying again: ‘But the TOS…’. Frustrating, to say at least. You started IM conversation with me, remember? So who was seeking attention, my dearest?
She just used cut and pasted one conversation in different posts, in every one of them she’s telling me “I’m trying to fix my computer but I don’t get it”..
I clearly told you I could not boot SL as I was not at home and Second Life does not resemble InDesign enough to boot it in a ‘labo’. I also told you we could continue the conversation by e-mail or on my blog, which you refused. Nothing wrong with my computer - besides the normal lack of RAM -, I was just not _behind_ it.
It’s just me and some friends explaining this basic concept of TSO’s legal status within and outside SL and she not understanding it…
Will you finally stop saying ‘TOS’ all the time? I never questioned you about the TOS. I was questioning about blog ethics and RL TOS/law that both frown upon posting privat(!) IM conversations without prior consent. By now you’ve got me wondering whom of the two of us is actually English-impaired.
To be honest we have probably brought her more attention than she deserves.
Well, I think the same about a certain Miss Honey Wendt. But if this is the case, would you please stop giving me attention by bothering my friends? I’m sure they wouldn’t mind.
DesertWolf Longstaff: Have you read all my posts?
Honey Wendt: I’m not following it.
So you actually are acting difficult about something you haven’t read? Way to go, lady!
She was offline and asking me the same question over and over, it’s pretty apparent she was trying to get me to comment so she can post stuff on her blog lol
Like you were doing with those escorts? :p
I didn’t bother with her cause she had no idea what the whole Linden deal was, she was too stuck up with ToS violations and age-play to see that a Linden was alt abusing.
No, hun. You got that wrong: I didn’t care about TOS violations. Or Linden alt abuse. Again: as both had nothing to do with you posting privat IM conversations on your blog.
I have a question, are you Vint Falken’s alt?
LMAO. (Sorry, DesertWolf.)
As you can see she came out pretty childish and pretending not to hear what I said, none of her comments were posted on her blog so it looks very skewed.
Childish? Me? Next thing you’re going to say I have a personality disorder (IM Cheri Horton, the two of you can wine together). I heard what you said: ‘TOS, TOS, TOS!’ But that was not what I was asking about.
[22:02] Honey Wendt: She is an age-play advocate right?
[22:08] Honey Wendt: Reason I ask is, that day someone mentioned they’ve seen some stuff for sale by her in a mall about age-play.
[22:10] DesertWolf Longstaff: Well you should at least verify the information you were given, shouldn’t you?
[22:10] Honey Wendt: Which information are you speaking of?
[22:11] DesertWolf Longstaff: No I ment what you just said about Vint selling age play related goods…
[22:11] Honey Wendt: I’m not interested in her
[22:11] DesertWolf Longstaff: You ask enough questions about her…
[22:11] Honey Wendt: Well since it concerned her
[22:11] Honey Wendt: yes, I had to ask.
[22:12] Honey Wendt: Oh her profile it says she does sell a book on age-play.
[22:12] Honey Wendt: Why are you against me?
Ow, poor Honey. Now DesertWolf is against you too. Ever considered he’s not ‘against you’, but just does not agree with you? And that that are two totally different things? The age play stuff I’m selling is this cartoon in the ‘Belgie’ sim. I’m not quite sure you can molest a child with that, though. Maybe if you attatch it to you right hand and move it around you can punch a juvenile. But that’s about it, I think. *scratches behind ears* Anyway, if you actually read my blog posts about age play before you started complaining/IM’ing me/IM’ing DesertWolf, you would have known I do not advocate sexual age play. Next thing we know you’re going to call me a facist too. I assume that certain ’someone’ was Wrom Morrison? I’ve IM’d him/her after he contacted a person I know, complaining about the cartoon. He/she did not answer my IM.
Honey Wendt: So, I’d like to know what this way is, I like it when someone points out something about me that might be faulty.
LMAO². Sorry, I’ve surely tried that and you surely did not like it, ignoring it and - yet again - saying ‘TOS! TOS! TOS!’ all the time. :D
This most probably sums it up, Miss Wendt thinks every age player is a criminal, and thus they have no rights nor should one treat them as any other
human beings avies:
[21:18] Honey Wendt: How is my apprach hypocritical?
[21:19] Honey Wendt: If we are discussing age-play?
[21:19] Honey Wendt: Her whole thing was bout the valdity of Terms of Services outside the bounds defined by those.
[21:19] DesertWolf Longstaff: no but the fact you use the TOS to against people in SL then do the thing you get on them about…
[21:19] Honey Wendt: But, the ToS is only valid within SL.
[21:20] DesertWolf Longstaff: yes, but comon decency and expecting to be treated the way others treat you is not
[21:20] Honey Wendt: Do you understand or you should read that e-mail I explained it a dozen times to her, while she was asking me the same question.
[21:20] Honey Wendt: Common decency?
[21:21] Honey Wendt: Mr. Longstaff are you defending these people?
[21:21] DesertWolf Longstaff: no..I thought we were not talking about age play?