Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 384

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 560

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 684

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 540

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_query_vars() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_where() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_search_where() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_join() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_search_join() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_groupby() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_tag_templates() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
Age play evokes childish behaviour | VintFalken.com
Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_add_meta_keywords() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
VintFalken.com

Age play evokes childish behaviour

May 24, 2007 10:36 am

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_the_content_filter() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 655

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 655

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 656

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 656

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::replaceTagWithLink() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 660

… and guess what? Imho, I’m not the one acting childish. :D

Anyway, here we go again. Did you ask her for her consent before copy pasting the chat logs on your blog, DesertWolf? ;) Honey told me before that I should not participate in this highly intellectual discussion - I think that was her way to tell me I’m stupid - but by now I’m starting to think she’s the one that could benefit from a brain cells donation, not me. :D

The italic part paragraphs are quotes from what Honey Wendt said to DesertWolf.

… to tell you that the conversation between me and her was totally different from what she posted, since she wanted this type of attention, I just muted her and never responded back to her.

Yeah right! I can shortly summerize the whole conversation: Honey Wendt telling me about the TOS, me saying I couldn’t care less about the TOS as it where (and are) her RL blog ethics I did (and do) not agree upon. And then Honey saying again: ‘But the TOS…’. Frustrating, to say at least. You started IM conversation with me, remember? So who was seeking attention, my dearest?

She just used cut and pasted one conversation in different posts, in every one of them she’s telling me “I’m trying to fix my computer but I don’t get it”..

I clearly told you I could not boot SL as I was not at home and Second Life does not resemble InDesign enough to boot it in a ‘labo’. I also told you we could continue the conversation by e-mail or on my blog, which you refused. Nothing wrong with my computer - besides the normal lack of RAM -, I was just not _behind_ it.

It’s just me and some friends explaining this basic concept of TSO’s legal status within and outside SL and she not understanding it…

Will you finally stop saying ‘TOS’ all the time? I never questioned you about the TOS. I was questioning about blog ethics and RL TOS/law that both frown upon posting privat(!) IM conversations without prior consent. By now you’ve got me wondering whom of the two of us is actually English-impaired.

To be honest we have probably brought her more attention than she deserves.

Well, I think the same about a certain Miss Honey Wendt. But if this is the case, would you please stop giving me attention by bothering my friends? I’m sure they wouldn’t mind.

DesertWolf Longstaff: Have you read all my posts?
Honey Wendt: I’m not following it.

So you actually are acting difficult about something you haven’t read? Way to go, lady!

She was offline and asking me the same question over and over, it’s pretty apparent she was trying to get me to comment so she can post stuff on her blog lol

Like you were doing with those escorts? :p

I didn’t bother with her cause she had no idea what the whole Linden deal was, she was too stuck up with ToS violations and age-play to see that a Linden was alt abusing.

No, hun. You got that wrong: I didn’t care about TOS violations. Or Linden alt abuse. Again: as both had nothing to do with you posting privat IM conversations on your blog.

I have a question, are you Vint Falken’s alt?

LMAO. (Sorry, DesertWolf.)

As you can see she came out pretty childish and pretending not to hear what I said, none of her comments were posted on her blog so it looks very skewed.

Childish? Me? Next thing you’re going to say I have a personality disorder (IM Cheri Horton, the two of you can wine together). I heard what you said: ‘TOS, TOS, TOS!’ But that was not what I was asking about.

[22:02] Honey Wendt: She is an age-play advocate right?

[22:08] Honey Wendt: Reason I ask is, that day someone mentioned they’ve seen some stuff for sale by her in a mall about age-play.

[22:10] DesertWolf Longstaff: Well you should at least verify the information you were given, shouldn’t you?

[22:10] Honey Wendt: Which information are you speaking of?
[22:11] DesertWolf Longstaff: No I ment what you just said about Vint selling age play related goods…
[22:11] Honey Wendt: I’m not interested in her
[22:11] DesertWolf Longstaff: You ask enough questions about her…
[22:11] Honey Wendt: Well since it concerned her
[22:11] Honey Wendt: yes, I had to ask.
[22:12] Honey Wendt: Oh her profile it says she does sell a book on age-play.
[22:12] Honey Wendt: Why are you against me?

Ow, poor Honey. Now DesertWolf is against you too. Ever considered he’s not ‘against you’, but just does not agree with you? And that that are two totally different things? The age play stuff I’m selling is this cartoon in the ‘Belgie’ sim. I’m not quite sure you can molest a child with that, though. Maybe if you attatch it to you right hand and move it around you can punch a juvenile. But that’s about it, I think. *scratches behind ears* Anyway, if you actually read my blog posts about age play before you started complaining/IM’ing me/IM’ing DesertWolf, you would have known I do not advocate sexual age play. Next thing we know you’re going to call me a facist too. I assume that certain ’someone’ was Wrom Morrison? I’ve IM’d him/her after he contacted a person I know, complaining about the cartoon. He/she did not answer my IM.

Honey Wendt: So, I’d like to know what this way is, I like it when someone points out something about me that might be faulty.

LMAO². Sorry, I’ve surely tried that and you surely did not like it, ignoring it and - yet again - saying ‘TOS! TOS! TOS!’ all the time. :D

This most probably sums it up, Miss Wendt thinks every age player is a criminal, and thus they have no rights nor should one treat them as any other human beings avies:

[21:18] Honey Wendt: How is my apprach hypocritical?
[21:19] Honey Wendt: If we are discussing age-play?
[21:19] Honey Wendt: Her whole thing was bout the valdity of Terms of Services outside the bounds defined by those.
[21:19] DesertWolf Longstaff: no but the fact you use the TOS to against people in SL then do the thing you get on them about…
[21:19] Honey Wendt: But, the ToS is only valid within SL.
[21:20] DesertWolf Longstaff: yes, but comon decency and expecting to be treated the way others treat you is not

[21:20] Honey Wendt: Do you understand or you should read that e-mail I explained it a dozen times to her, while she was asking me the same question.
[21:20] Honey Wendt: Common decency?
[21:21] Honey Wendt: Mr. Longstaff are you defending these people?
[21:21] DesertWolf Longstaff: no..I thought we were not talking about age play?

10 Responses to “Age play evokes childish behaviour”

DesertWolf Longstaff wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Vint I showed her the same consideration she shows others when it comes to posting logs to a personal blog.

Zoe Connolly wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

“I have a question, are you Vint Falken’s alt?”

LMAO

No wonder DW was so quiet when you were at my party, Vint.

Ah Ha!

LMFAO

tiana meriman wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

i want this person to im me too, she seems highly entertaining. ^^ plus i have experience with sturborn children. maybe i can make her understand that common decency is just as important as the TOS

lolla wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

posted on wrong blog b4

//deleted a part here// that caused them to come and mess with my role play in no way does my role play within second life harm children it doesn’t even involve children but these morally right religious f*cks have to come and mess with two consenting adults thank u for exposing their real agenda

its really sad that no blogger is blogging about how stupid second lifes rules r nowjust think ageplay inside secondlife is only among adults

Edit: Sorry, but do tone down your language, will you?! Deleted a rather offensive part and put in some asterix. Vint

lolla wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

i apologize about the language vint

i have lost over 1500 us dollars worth of investment in sl when they banned me from it for nothing that involved a child all my characters were removed i called their billing and i was put on hold for 30 mins after which an automated system answered they would not do anything about this

im convinced its a major psychological issue with people like this honey who were abused as children think they are morally right and justified in going after any sort of rp that –only they themselves– feel leads to what harm was done by someone sick. but this is not true, our rp does not involve children or anything of that sort

our role play is just role play, regardless of how honey and her friends at lindenlabs view it it is just it it’s not an abuse of real life children

very sad people dont understand role play before they came for us they went after bdsm and any even furries on tv there was a show that painted furries in a bad light this went reflected on secondlife and people hated them for it same with bdsm and now this

i feel the reason i play a younger character is cause it makes me live in that past when i was younger and feel the youth and enjoy those parts of my life i miss a lot i think this is how many people who do lolita ageplay would tell it’s like finding the fountain of youth and that happened to be secondlife

and now we are denied it cause morally right religious freaks like honey and those people in lindenlabs think its not right for us to do what we like in our world

i tell you vint first it would be us ageplayers next it would be escorts next it would be bdsm next it would be furries and so on.. till no one is left like that poem

loki wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

… and when they came for me there was no one left to stand up for me …

That’s the real danger in all of this. Who will draw the line and where? I sympathise with you Lolla …

KolaLafonda wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Vint: Whatever stood here before was very very stupid. *Deletes comment*

Myg wrote a comment on May 24, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

holy shit what a comment.

Alex Burgess wrote a comment on May 25, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Ever considered he’s not ‘against you’, but just does not agree with you? And that that are two totally different things?

That’s a serious point, Vint, and one that unfortunately many people when they get emotionally tied up in an issue have a difficult time understanding. There are many distinct and nuanced opinions on everything related to “ageplay” and there is a lot of gray area. (And it *is* gray area if there are differences of opinion, no matter how clear any one person may think the issue is.) It is important to have conversations about it–and, though this has not been the most constructive of exchanges, I thank you and DesertWolf for being willing to enter into the fray.

Timothy Lilliehook wrote a comment on May 25, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

In totally unrelated news:

I really think somebody should build a sim that resembles an InDesign workspace, so that we can be online at work and sell it as

“The new InDesign CS5, gotta check that out! It has 3D now!”

;-)

Care to comment?