Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 384

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 560

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 684

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 540

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_query_vars() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_where() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_search_where() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_join() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_search_join() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_groupby() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_tag_templates() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
Branding in SL: Veyron ownz my ass | VintFalken.com
Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_add_meta_keywords() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
VintFalken.com

Branding in SL: Veyron ownz my ass

May 19, 2007 10:52 am

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_the_content_filter() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 655

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 655

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 656

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 656

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::replaceTagWithLink() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 660

… or ‘How to leave a lasting impression upon your mantourage‘.

Veyron 0wnz Vint's buttI have some friends in SL that often have strange but interesting ideas. Veyron is definitely one of ‘those kind’ of friends. She figured something was needed to distinct her mantourage from the rest of the caddle and to indicate ownership. Butt brands will serve that purpose just fine, no? And as no guinea pig was present, I had to first try it out myself to see how it looks. Hmmm, neat! And by now I can add that it looks great on male butts wrapped in butterfly silks too. I also wonder how it would look on Furzi’s. *Must make something like this myself.* Alex, Dalien and Wrath, what do you guys prefer? Left or right butt cheek? And shall I add some nail marks too? *grins* I’ve considered putting it on the inner thigh, but it’s way more difficult to put readable text there. :(

And can someone please explain to me why men that are good builders and scripters seem to have utterly no knowledge about how to make theirselves a new pair of pants or underpants? Let alone put a texture/fabric upon those? *shocked*

And some thoughts on SLavery:

[10:50] Vint Falken: me neither, it’s rather a waste of precious SL time
[10:50] Vint Falken: obeying someone else’s orders
[10:50] Dalien Talbot: yup
[10:50] Dalien Talbot: and the same thing about commanding
[10:50] Vint Falken: now if you could tell them ’script me this’ or ‘build me that’
[10:50] Vint Falken: I see the benefits
[10:50] Dalien Talbot: hahah
[10:50] Dalien Talbot: then it is called a corporation :)


    Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/post.php on line 117

    Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/post.php on line 117

    Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/post.php on line 117
  • Cosy cuteness (in green)
  • Mantourage
  • Tiessa Montgolfier, Shadows Inc.

11 Responses to “Branding in SL: Veyron ownz my ass”

Veyron Supercharge wrote a comment on May 19, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Vint’s my hero! On demand branding…. :)

Veyron Supercharge wrote a comment on May 20, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Dalien, when will you be modeling Vint’s little brand she made, JUST FOR YOU TO WEAR?

Dal wrote a comment on May 20, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

hmm you want an official Dalien statement ? :)

Ok, it’s too big for this entry, but I will surely post it on my blog :) stay tuned…

edit by Vint: Dalien’s official statemant on my mantourage brand.

Vint Falken wrote a comment on May 20, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Well… I have pant’s layer left. But then I can’t wear pants! (And my tats are on my underpants + socks layer.)

Dal wrote a comment on May 20, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

I’m sure eventually we find some solution… :-)

October Hush wrote a comment on May 21, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Running out of layers irks me. Especially the fact that there’s only one “tattoo” layer for the head. It’s so limiting.

Vint Falken wrote a comment on May 21, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Tobie!!! There is?!!!! One can put tattoo’s over the head-skin? Please tell me I’m not dreaming this! (and how I do that :p)

October Hush wrote a comment on May 21, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

No! That’s what I mean…if you wear a skin, then you’ve used up your “head layer”. And everyone wears a skin unless they’re a newbie. We need more head layers!

Vint Falken wrote a comment on May 22, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

Ow. :(((((( Which Linden do we start bugging for that? Open Letter to Linden Labs: ‘Fashionistas kindly demand more head layers!’. ;)

October Hush wrote a comment on May 22, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

The term “head layer” sounds naughty.

Wait, Qdot Bunnyhug is a linden, we can bug him…he’s naughty! ;-)

Vint Falken wrote a comment on May 23, 2007
MyAvatars 0.2

We could call a strike, you know? ;) ‘Fashionistas will dress lousy and put breasts size at max until we get extra layers for our heads!’ (Still sounds wrong, no?)

Care to comment?