Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 384

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 560

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 684

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 540

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_query_vars() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_where() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_search_where() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_join() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_search_join() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_posts_groupby() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_tag_templates() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
M. Linden states ‘Progress’, but forgot to mention a few things? | VintFalken.com
Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_add_meta_keywords() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
VintFalken.com

M. Linden states ‘Progress’, but forgot to mention a few things?

September 29, 2008 9:37 pm

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::ultimate_the_content_filter() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 655

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 655

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 656

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::regExEscape() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 656

Strict Standards: Non-static method UltimateTagWarriorActions::replaceTagWithLink() should not be called statically in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/UltimateTagWarrior/ultimate-tag-warrior-actions.php on line 660

M. Linden on the official Linden Blog says we - err.. Linden Lab & the grid - are doing fine: ‘All are indications that Second Life is becoming more relevant, more usable and more reliable.

We should be delighted about:

  1. Peak concurrency of 71,232. (+38% compared to 2007)
  2. Daily user-to-user transactions in Linden Dollars continue their steady climb.
  3. Viewer crash rates have declined.
  4. Database/network/simulator outages are down substantially.

Promises & upcoming releases:

  1. A viewer that is new user friendly. (Let’s hope they took a look at the User Design Interface contest submissions.)
  2. The Department of Public Works will continue to spend our taxes.
  3. By the end of the year, the Second Life viewer will be fully localized for all the major markets.
  4. Product focus. (On what did not get mentioned. Neither what the actual ‘product’ is.)

Things M Linden forgot to mention:

  1. Communications towards users are down substantially.
  2. SLim.
  3. Philip’s hair did not get fixed. Land prices.
  4. Age verification and it’s status & the Teen Grid’s future.
  5. Anything else - positive or negative - M missed? =)


      Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/post.php on line 117

      Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/post.php on line 117

      Strict Standards: Only variables should be assigned by reference in /home/vintfalk/public_html/wp-includes/post.php on line 117
    • Quick Reference Guide on Positioning Prim Attachments
    • Vlaamsch en inSL?
    • RMB City in Second Life

7 Responses to “M. Linden states ‘Progress’, but forgot to mention a few things?”

MyAvatars 0.2

[…] more improvements are promised, the biggest one being the development of a new Second Life browser. Vint Falken has some interesting insights on what wasn’t […]

ArminasX wrote a comment on September 30, 2008
MyAvatars 0.2

I was really hoping Philip’s hair got fixed. It really does look a lot better in real life. Really! It does!

Sean FitzGerald wrote a comment on September 30, 2008
MyAvatars 0.2

Missing - no mention of the promise to open source the server software… again. It has completely slipped of the official radar. Not a mention in any recent blog posts, articles or interviews involving M. or Philip.

Day Oh wrote a comment on September 30, 2008
MyAvatars 0.2

Governance

Nock Forager wrote a comment on October 1, 2008
MyAvatars 0.2

I’m so delighted with Mono script engine :)

Vint Falken wrote a comment on October 1, 2008
MyAvatars 0.2

Sean, good point here. I would assume their ‘open sourcing’ path, is a part of the product focus. Depending on what they will offer as product/whom they want to sell too, they’ll base their decisions. So yeah, some more info on that would definitely been great!

Day Oh, what exactly do you mean with ‘Governance’? The ToS, legistation, more in-world activity from Lindens? DMCA handling? … ?

@Nock, glad at least one person is not complaining about that one!

Daniel Voyager wrote a comment on October 1, 2008
MyAvatars 0.2

Again, nothing said about the Teen Second Life statistics or anything mentioned for the future of TG.

:(

I’m trying my best to make my voice heard for TSL. :). Just 2 months away from transfering to the MG, yay. :p

Care to comment?