<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Own the content, not the - virtual - world</title>
	<link>http://www.vintfalken.com/own-the-content-not-the-world/</link>
	<description>Exporting an SL photographer's Second Life</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vint Falken</title>
		<link>http://www.vintfalken.com/own-the-content-not-the-world/#comment-12029</link>
		<dc:creator>Vint Falken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vintfalken.com/own-the-content-not-the-world/#comment-12029</guid>
		<description>It was always OK according to Linden Lab to use a child avatar in Second Life? It were only residents making a fuss, putting up signs that say 'forbidden for child avs', etc?

I see the right of existence for child avatars as a community standard. (But I guess I made that clear already a few times. ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was always OK according to Linden Lab to use a child avatar in Second Life? It were only residents making a fuss, putting up signs that say &#8216;forbidden for child avs&#8217;, etc?</p>
<p>I see the right of existence for child avatars as a community standard. (But I guess I made that clear already a few times. ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dandellion Kimban</title>
		<link>http://www.vintfalken.com/own-the-content-not-the-world/#comment-11879</link>
		<dc:creator>dandellion Kimban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vintfalken.com/own-the-content-not-the-world/#comment-11879</guid>
		<description>Yes, that changes as the circumstances changes. If Linden's ass is in danger the content is owned by residents. If they are trying to talk with big corps, the "residents own content" part becomes invisible. 
Though, it really surprised me that now again it is OK to have child avatar. Question is can we take that as a community standard and a rule or that will change too as soon as Angry-Bored-Mothers-Concerned-For-Their-Spoiled-Brats start yelling around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that changes as the circumstances changes. If Linden&#8217;s ass is in danger the content is owned by residents. If they are trying to talk with big corps, the &#8220;residents own content&#8221; part becomes invisible.<br />
Though, it really surprised me that now again it is OK to have child avatar. Question is can we take that as a community standard and a rule or that will change too as soon as Angry-Bored-Mothers-Concerned-For-Their-Spoiled-Brats start yelling around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
