Comments on: SLart me up!

By: We meet again « everyday second life

We meet again « everyday second life — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:56:34 +0000

[…] the last few days I’ve taken the time to go visit them. It’s been a delight – the SLart scene is even bigger than I first thought. One gallery was a bit special, though, and that was the […]

By: dandellion Kimban

dandellion Kimban — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:33:32 +0000

Thanks dear.
If he picked design he would not be in situation to chase people about what they have in their profiles. Pardon, he whould not be in situation to THINK he can do that.

By: Vint

Vint — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:05:28 +0000

They should abolish such standard character trademarks. Really, just pick a clear design and colour combination for ‘SLart’ and he should not worry about people by accident mistaking our stuff for his, as it would be styled totally different. It would have been less ass-style that way too.

And I’ve corrected the Kimban. I’m sorry, hon. ;)

Also, a more in-depth post on the SLart trademark on Virtually Blind.

By: dandellion Kimban

dandellion Kimban — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:16:50 +0000

hon, please… kimbaN… thanks… *kisses*

By: dandellion Kimban

dandellion Kimban — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:08:35 +0000

… and it doesn’t matter if you write that word as SLart, slart, slART or whatever variety in capitalisation you can think of.

By: Daman Tenk

Daman Tenk — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:43:01 +0000

Faerie, Katrina, wrong.

He registered it as a standard character trademark, not a design trademark.

The standard character format should be used to register word(s), letter(s), number(s) or any combination thereof, without claim to any particular font style, size, or color, and absent any design element. Registration of a mark in the standard character format will provide broad rights, namely use in any manner of presentation. The stylized or design format, on the other hand, is appropriate if you wish to register a mark with a design element or word(s) or letter(s) having a particular stylized appearance that you wish to protect.

By: Katrina Mishow

Katrina Mishow — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:05:07 +0000

Now that I think of it.. Faerie is very correct.. The trademark is the visual of that. Copyright is where he would have to go, for any legality. Trademark would be the visual logo that he uses, identifying his brand or product.. and he never is consistant of it’s color.

And I’m pretty sure Maxx Something is correct as well.. It doesn’t matter where the offender is based. It matters what country the material is placed on. That might be all wet, as I’m not really all that deep into the legal portions of this stuff..

By: peluda

peluda — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:46:49 +0000

OMG my english is getting worse . I SU your A** off.
Now everybody sees that words can have different meanings just like “slart” hihi }8-)=

By: peluda

peluda — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:34:54 +0000

“and better not do it” i meant sorry fot that (not for the A and the two *)

By: peluda

peluda — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:32:42 +0000

phonetically all we read is [sla:rt] so just a stupid word not meaning secondlife nor art . It doesn’t say “secondlife art” , it only suggests in a quite mediocre and very unoriginal way something. Boy i am happy nobody has trademarked my secondlife art word yet ” SecondliFART”
i better not do it CAUSE I SEW YOUR A** OFF .